Dr. William P. Banks
Assistant Professor of Composition/Rhetoric
Phone: 252.328.6674
Email: banksw@ecu.edu
|
Time: W 6:30 - 9:00 p.m.
Place: 2016 Bate Bldg.
Office Hours: TR, 11:00 - 12:00 p.m.
W,
2:00 - 4:00 p.m.
Office: 2143 Bate Bldg.
|
Qualitative Research Methods
in Composition & Rhetoric
Introduction
At the heart of this course is the issue that distinguishes what most
scholars recognize about their "work" from what the general public
tends to regard as our "work." Here, I'm speaking of the classic disctinction
between "research" and "teaching,"
distinctions that many academics continue to regard as a fixed dichotomy. Research,
variously defined and configured in different disciplines in the university,
comes to us from the French word recherche, which means to
explore or search, to engage in a quest. Obviously, there are any number
of ways to go about such a search or quest, and like those
of classical heroes of antiquity, our quests can be fraught with pitfalls
and minor tragedies.
This course invites graduate students into the complex systems of research
that scholars in Rhetoric and Composition (and, to some extent, Technical and Professional Communication) have engaged in for at least
the last 25 years as we began to articulate a discipline-specific research
paradigm, one we hoped would yield a disciplined body of knowledge recognized
by our peers in other disciplines. The trip has not been easy, and as the
articles and books we read this semester will make clear, often we have
argued extensively with each other. At the heart of a discussion about
any methodology are always concerns about language,
truth, and human ethics, and these are areas fraught with disagreements and conflicts. Along those lines, this course also encourages graduate students to reconsider what counts as research. There are still many in the academy who do not regard investigations into teaching/classroom practice as research-proper; I hope this course vexes those assumptions.
As the professor for this course, I hope that I can share with you my
own experiences conducting various types of research as we investigate
together possibilities that might turn into your own theses and dissertations.
Goals of English 7601/8601
Upon completing English 7601/8601, each graduate student should
be able to
- Recognize and articulate the primary epistemologies at work in
the various research methods and methodologies studied during the
semester;
- Understand the particular complexities involved in classroom-based
and historical research, as well as research in electronic environments;
- Understand the ethical dimensions of conducting different kinds
of research;
- Complete an Internal Review Board (IRB) educational module and
protocol;
- Locate, evaluate, and synthesize primary and secondary, print
and electronic bibliographic sources that contribute significantly
to
projects
developed in consultation with the professor;
- Propose a research project connected to Composition and Rhetoric,
one which demonstrates the student's understanding of the methodological
complexities involved in conducting, assessing, and publishing the
research.
To meet these goals, graduate students will generally read between
100 and 150 pages per week, take part in online discussion boards,
post responses to readings on individual student blogs, and engage
in other projects listed below.
Texts
- Brown, Stephen Gilbert & Sidney I. Dobrin. Ethnography Unbound: From Theory Shock to Critical Praxis. Albany: SUNY Pr, 2004. ISBN: 0791460525
- DeVoss, Danielle & Heidi McKee. Digital Writing Research: Technologies, Methodologies, and Ethical Issues. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Pr, 2007. ISBN: (this text is not yet published but should be available mid-semester)
- Farris, Chrisitine & Chris M. Anson. Under Construction:
Research, Theory, Practice. Logan: Utah State UP, 1998. ISBN: 0874212561
- Kirsch, Gesa & Patricia A. Sullivan. Methods and Methodology
in Composition Research. Carbondale: SIUP, 1994. ISBN:
- Power, Brenda Miller. Taking Note: Improving Your Observational Notetaking. Portland, ME: Stenhouse, 1996. ISBN: 1571100350
- Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd. Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003. ISBN: 0761925538
- Course Packet of Readings To Be Assigned (at times, these will
be PDFs available from links on the course
schedule and/or
assignments links)
- Internet-based websites/articles as listed on the course schedule
Instructor Expectations
Obviously, I expect a great deal of commitment from graduate
students. By choosing to tackle graduate school, you have plunged yourselves
further into the world of the "scholar." I hope you will enjoy that
work and take advantage of this time to read, write, and think about
issues and ideas you haven't considered before, or to go further than
you have in the past. "Reading" in graduate school, especially for
doctoral students, is an exhausting activity. While I expect graduate
students "read" everything I assign, I hope that you will learn quickly
how to "skim and save." Do NOT try to read all these texts like you
would poems or novels, pouring over each sentence looking for nuances
of meaning. Try to get the big picture, isolate the key arguments/points
of the text, and keep it archived for future reference. Some texts,
I expect you to devour; others may not hold you interest. That's normal.
Regardless, I expect you to always have a passing acquaintance
with ALL our readings and an engaged friendship with selected
others. Obviously, I expect that we'll have tremendous fun as we work
hard together this semester.
Projects
The following brief annotations will provide some context for
the sort of projects that this course will require this semester. More
thorough explanations, where necessarily, will become available over
the course of the semester through the "Schedule" and "Assignment" links
that bookend this document.
- Research Blog (30%) Active and
engaged researchers keep careful notes both of their own data regarding
research subjects and the scholarship (data) of other researchers
who have published their own findings. Researchers also need to know
the in's and out's of methodological controversies. As we read
this semester, you will write weekly responses to one or several
of the texts we're reading, posting these responses to your class
blog by Tuesday mornings @ 8:00 a.m. so that other class members
can read and respond to your posts for the next 24 hours. Wednesday night classes will start
with reflections on these posts.
- Classroom Observations (10%) After
we read Taking Note,
students will conduct three (3) classroom observations of a single writing
class (first-year
comp, advanced comp, tech. writing, etc.) that they will select and will turn in both their observational notes and their narrative/analytical reflections on their observations.
Due dates will be announced on the schedule.
- Annotated Bibliography (PhD) (20%)
Doctoral students in the course will use the "rhetorical
précis" as
a model for how to annotate a bibliography of research involving
one of several 'emerging' methodologies that we discuss throughout the semester. Bibliographies should contain at least 10 to 12 article-length
sources; book chapters count as one source. Students
will share their bibliographies with the rest of the
class after midterm.
- Midterm Take-Home Exam (MA) (20%)
Master's students will have a take-home midterm exam which will ask
them them
synthesize the materials we've read over the first half of the semester.
Details will be forthcoming.
- Major Project (30%) All students
will produce a Major Project which 1) proposes a research question
relevant
to Composition and Rhetoric, 2) surveys a sampling of the published
research already available, 3) articulates methods and methodologies
to collect and process the data, and 4) demonstrates an awareness
of the possible ethical or scholarly concerns for a researcher who
might conduct this project. After midterm, students will write short
proposals for a research project, conference with the professor,
and then begin work on the four parts of the Major Project.
- Studentship (10%) Studentship refers to attending class, participating in face-to-face discussions, participating in online discussions, and meeting assigned deadlines for projects.
Attendance
Graduate students by default should be at every class meeting, especially
for a class which means only once each week. Emergencies and problems
arise, so I can overlook your missing one week of class, especially
since individual students can contribute significantly on the course
blog the week they miss in order to "make up" for not being physically
present. Missing more than once, however, will impact the course
grade. Graduate classes rely on the presence of engaged students to be successful;
as such, your absenses will jeopardize learning for others, which
isn't acceptable.
Late Work
We all have very busy, trying lives, and as such, there come
times when we have to complete some work late. Each student in this class
is allowed an occasional late blog response, or other
short piece of writing. Midterms assignments are set in stone and may
not be late. Neither major projects nor drafts of major projects may
be turned in late, as turning the drafts in late would invalidate the
reason for drafting in the first place and turning in final
projects late would prevent me from reading and evaluating them in time
to turn in grades at the end of the semester. Students may always turn
projects in early.
Conferences
Students
should schedule conferences with me when they do not understand comments
I've made on their projects or when they become confused about the expectations
of this course. Likewise, I may require a certain number of individual
and/or group conferences
during
the semester. After midterm, I will schedule conferences to discuss major
project proposals.
Academic Integrity
Students
are expected to be honest about individual effort and responsible
to peer/secondary
source materials that are included in their projects. Both plagiarizing
and turning in work written partially
or completely by someone else are forms of academic dishonesty and carry
serious penalties, the least serious of which is a grade of zero on the
particular assignment (and thus a D, at best, in the course), but could
also result in failure of the class and even expulsion
from the university. Students who keep up with their work and consult with their
peers and their professor have no reason or need to "cheat." Since
this course is focused on research ethics, I expect that students will
see me if they are unsure about how to cite or represent ideas/writing
by others so that we can figure it out without ending up in a nasty plagiarism
case.
Computers in the Classroom
Because we
meet in a computer-mediated classroom, we will make frequent use
of the machines. However, certain computer-related behaviors will
not be tolerated. You may check your email or free-surf the web
as you please before and after class, but after I announce the beginning
of class by starting the roll, any student still using email, chat programs,
or web browsers for non-class-related activities will loose
points for participation or may even be considered absent from class
for the day. **Likewise,
students retain sole responsibility for keeping electronic copies of
all their work.** Lost or stolen disks, erased disks,
home computer crashes, printer problems, etc. do NOT excuse you from
turning in work or having copies of all your work on disk at the end
of the semester. Remember to make frequent back-up copies of files
and keep copies on multiple disks.
Accommodations for Students with Special Needs
East Carolina University seeks to fully comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Students requesting accommodations based on a covered disability must go to the Department for Disability Support Services, located in Slay 138, to verify the disability before any accommodations can occur. The telephone number is 737-1016.
|