|
January |
February | March | April | May
This schedule may change; check it often to verify
due dates and such.
Last Updated: March 21, 2007
January
| 10 |
Class Begins
Guest Speaker from IRB: Michelle Eble
|
**Sometime before class meets on January
31, each member of the class should take the Institutional
Review Board
Online Education Module. From that page, you'll be directed
off-site to the education modules. I think it takes about 3 hours to complete the full set, but you can do them a few at a time in shorter increments. |
| 17 |
What is Research in Composition and Rhetoric?
Why Do We Do It?
Discuss Syllabus/Schedule
Mini-Lecture: "The Work of Composition and Rhetoric, a Brief History
and Review"
Discuss Readings |
Readings
for This Week
Methods & Methodologies (MM)
- Kirsch & Sullivan, “Introduction”
Under Construction (UC)
- Farris & Anson, “Introduction”
- Ferry, “Theory, Research, Practice, Work”
- Vandenberg, “Composing Composition Studies”
- Zebroski, “Toward a Theory of Theory for CS”
Remember to post your Reading Response to your course Blog. |
| 24 |
Action Research/Teacher Research
Discuss Classroom Observation Practices
|
Readings for This Week
Power, Taking Note
CP
- Berlin, "The Teacher as Researcher"
- Hillocks, "Teaching, Reflecting, Researching"
- Bissex, "Small Is Beautiful"
- Myers, "Overview of Procedures in Teacher Research"
- Mertler, "Introduction to Action Research"
Remember to post your Reading Response to your course Blog. |
| 31 |
Action Research/Teacher Research
Designing Research Projects |
Readings for This Week
MM
- Mortensen, “Analyzing Talk about Writing”
- Ray, “Composition from the Teacher-Research Point of
View”
- Beach, “Experimental and Descriptive Research Methods
in Composition”
EU
- Williams & Brydon-Miller, "Changing Directions"
CP
|
February
| 7 |
Case Study: Representing Research
Discuss Readings |
Readings for this Week
Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods
MM
- Newkirk, “The Narrative Roots of the Case Study”
UC
- Bishop, "Rhetoric of Teacher Talk"
CP
Remember to post your Reading Response to your course Blog. |
| 14 |
Critical Ethnography
Discuss Readings
|
Readings for This Week
MM
- Moss, “Ethnography and Composition”
EU
- Brown & Dobrin, "Introduction"
- Brook & Hogg, "Open to Change"
- Hanson, "Critical Auto/Ethnography"
- Alsup, "Protean Subjectivities"
Remember to post your Reading Response to your course Blog. |
| 21 |
Critical Ethnography
Discuss Readings
|
Readings for This Week
EU
- Reiff, "Mediating Materiality and Discusivity"
- Schroeder, "Ethnographic Experience ..."
- Gorzelsky, "Shifting Figures"
- Massey, "Just What Are We Talking About?
- Lu, "Ethics of Reading Critical Ethnography"
CP
Remember to post your Reading Response to your course Blog. |
| 28 |
Historical Research
Field Trip to ECU Archives: Meet in Joyner Special Collections,
4th Floor
Archive Links:
Discuss Archival Research Issues
What does it mean to write history? What histories need to be written?
What's a "rhetorical history"? What's the difference between history and historiography?
|
Readings for This Week
MM
- Connors, “Dreams and Play: Historical Method and Methodology”
CP
Remember to post your Reading Response to your course Blog. |
March
| 7 |
Historical Research
DUE: Class Observations Notes and Reflective Memo |
Readings
for This Week
EU
- Gaillet, "Writing Program Redesign"
CP
Remember to post your Reading Response to your course Blog. |
| 14 |
SPRING BREAK
|
|
| 21 |
Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) / Rhetorical Analysis / Assessment
Discuss Readings
DUE: Annotated Bibliographies
|
Readings for This Week
UC
- Huot & Williamson, "What Difference ... Make"
CP
|
| 28 |
Research in Electronic Environments (Classrooms
& Students)
NO CLASS THIS WEEK
|
Readings for This Week
|
April
| 4 |
Research in Electronic Environments (In & Beyond the Classroom) | Epistemological Issues
Discussion Starters:
- If you had to name the "method(s)" employed by Elias & Brown, Alexander, and McKee, what would you call it/them? Why?
- Elias & Brown think of "E-mail as Rhetorical Space" — what might that mean? What makes a "rhetorical space" and what makes E-mail different from other rhetorical spaces? Are list-servs and E-mail the same thing? What subtle distinctions separate them?
- What "rhetorical spaces" other than E-mail might scholars in Rhet-Comp, TPC, and Discourse study?
- How does Alexander deploy "cultural studies" as a method/methodology? What roles do "narrative" and "case study" play in Alexander's work?
- What problems does Sullivan find with a singlular methodological approach?
- In what ways does Sullivan's "methodological pluralism" evidence of a rhetorical practice/agenda? What makes this method "rhetorical"?
- Sullivan offers two "components" of feminist scholarship (40 - 41) that make it mostly an issue of critical reading. How does that function methodologically? Is "critical reading" a methodology? What are its parameters?
- In what way is feminist research and critique "proactive" according to Sullivan (49)?
- How do Hawisher & Sullivan construct feminist methodologies in online spaces (170)? Epistemologically (RE: Knoblauch), where do these methods lie?
- On the Internet, what are the differences, if any, between an interview and a survey?
- What problems, if any, do you see in Hawisher & Sullivan's research sample/selection of participants?
- "What constitutes feminist action in e-space?" (Hawisher & Sullivan 193)
- How does their research report (essay) vex notions of authorship and research? the role of research "subjects" or "participants"?
|
Readings for This Week
Online
CP
Remember to post your Reading Response to your course Blog.
|
| 11 |
Troubling Research Paradigms
/ Epistemologies
Discuss Readings |
Readings for This Week
UC
- MacDonald, “Voice of Research”
- Neff, “Grounded Theory”
- Rose and Lauer, “Feminist Methodology”
- Chiang, “Insider/Outsider/Other?”
- Cushman and Monberg, “Re-centering Authority”
- Ray and Barton, “Farther Afield”
Remember to post your Reading Response to your course Blog. |
| 18 |
Last Night of Class
Major Project Draft #1 Due for Peer Review
| Peer Responders |
Papers to Read |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Email Dr. Banks your projects for some preliminary
feedback by Wednesday @ 6:30 p.m.
NOTE: You might want to think in terms of "sections" for this draft. Perhaps you're ready to write the justification for the project inquiry, so you write the introduction and theoretical justification -- an exploration what scholarship has been done on this subject; perhaps you know what sort of qualitative or quatitative methods you want to use to gather data and want to write that part for this week. You needed try to start from the beginning, but be sure to tell your readers what's missing so far so that they don't just tell you what you already know is absent in this draft. |
| 25 |
No Class - University Reading Day |
|
May
| 2 |
Final Exam Time
Presentations |
Final Projects Due by Class Time Tonight. |
|